First off, this article was far too long. Get to the point, quick waltzing around it. It was also too fluffy and optimistic for me. (And I'm generally an optimistic person.)
Here are my problems with the article:
I think the article says more than it realizes when it mentions Mr. Taylor, one of the Teach For America's teachers the article focuses upon:
**Mr. Taylor wants to become a principal. In just three years as a teacher, he feels that he has already run up against the limits of his classroom. He wants to bring what he has learned to scale. That way, he says, “it won’t just stay with me, bundled in Room 204.” He is, like many great teachers, well aware that he is not one in a million—or at least, that he should not be.**
Teachers can take a large part of the blow for students' performance, but teachers can't perform without supportive and intelligent administrators. (I'm leaving this blog public, so I'll leave it at that. Read between the lines.)
They described the teacher walking around in the classroom with a Bluetooth headset on. Poor choice for creating a competent. Anyone who is not a secretary that walks around with a bluetooth on at work is automatically a tool.
The article says "If some kids get it wrong, they have not embarrassed themselves by individually raising their hand and announcing their mistake." ---really? The article treats that as if it is a simple feat and as a false generalization. No matter what situation, certain students are not comfortable "announcing their mistake."
Most importantly, this article only focuses on math. What about other subjects? How have success rates changed based on teachers in other subjects. The article mentions english a few times, but only to say you can't the results aren't as dynamic as math. This makes me conclude, that maybe teaching math is more teacher dependent than other subjects. To be a good reader, you must be reading at home. There is simply not enough time in the school day to improve you the amount you need. Parents and homelife do make a difference, although the article tries to sway its readers to believe otherwise.
It also states "I try, but I can’t find a child who isn’t talking about math." ---really?? He must have seen an extraordinary day in that classroom. Even the best teachers I've ever had did not have 100% participation and focus of students, its human nature, you're going to get off task at least once in a period...especially if you're in 4th grade. And I'd just like to add, not matter how good your lesson or presentation or energy is, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't force it to drink. I think the writer exagerated a bit.
Another statement I found unbelievable, his policy of putting your head down if you don't feel up to participating and he said,“I’ve never had anybody put their head down,” he says, matter-of-factly. “In three years?” I ask. “No.” --he's not teaching where we are, or maybe it has to do with the age we are...I have students everyday come in tired from dealing with problems at home, taking care of siblings, or upset about serious and troubling events. I have students every day that need to put their head down so they don't cuss someone out or hit someone.
Another bad idea for unprepared districts: "The rest will be based largely on five observation sessions conducted throughout the year by their principal, assistant principal, and a group of master educators. Throughout the year, teachers will receive customized training. At year’s end, teachers who score below a certain threshold could be fired. --Administrators!! Ahhh!! They are not always the best evaluators. Enough said, this blog is public. The article continues with "If state and local school officials, along with teachers unions, step up to the challenge, Race to the Top could begin to rationalize America’s schools." What teacher's union? Enough said.
Good points that the article brings up about effective teachers:
-they present information using many methods so students can think about it many different ways
-they constantly assess and adjust their instruction based on their assessment
-they create strong procedures so no class time is wasted and the kids know what's coming
-they connect with parents and the community about good and bad things, even when the parents aren't making the effort to connect with them
“I found that the kids were not hard. It was explaining the information to them that was hard. You paint this picture in your head about how you will teach this lesson, and you can teach the whole lesson and no one gets it.”
And to answer your question Ben:
MTC should choose teachers based on if they majored in the subject, went to selective colleges, and showed an improving GPA throughout college...according to the article. That sounds fair enough to me. You've got to make a choice somehow, just don't discount the wild card that may not fit that criteria, but have the drive.
Recent Comments